Trade Agreements In Economics

October 11, 2021

Second, the multilateral removal of trade barriers can reduce political opposition to free trade in each of the countries concerned. This is because groups that otherwise oppose trade reforms or would be indifferent could join the campaign for free trade if they saw opportunities to export to other countries in the trade deal. Therefore, free trade agreements between countries or regions are a useful strategy for the liberalization of world trade. Economists have developed a series of sophisticated models to simulate changes in economic conditions that might be expected from a trade deal. These models, based on modern economic trade theories, are useful when trade barriers are quantifiable, although the results are very sensitive to the assumptions used to define the parameters of the model. For example, one nation could allow free trade with another nation, with the exception of exceptions that prohibit the importation of certain drugs that have not been authorized by its regulators, or animals that have not been vaccinated or processed foods that do not meet their standards. Then Adam Smith challenged this dominant thought in The Wealth of Nations, published in 1776. [2] Smith argued that if one nation is more efficient in making one product than another country, while the other nation is more efficient in making another product, then both nations could benefit from trade. This would allow each nation to specialize in making the product, where it would have an absolute advantage, thereby increasing total production compared to what it would be without trade.

This discernment implies a policy very different from that of mercantilism. This means less state participation in the economy and a reduction in trade barriers. [29] See z.B. ibid., 54: “The theory of comparative advantage is assumed that trade is balanced (i.e., exports correspond to the value of imports) and that labour is fully occupied. If trade is not balanced, the surplus country must export certain goods for which it has no “real” comparative advantage. To succeed in a neo-Omerkantiist strategy, a country of course needs to have access to other markets that provide for the gradual liberalization of trade barriers within the framework of the GATT/WTO. Neo-Mercantiists typically focus on key industries chosen by the government, a strategy known as industrial policy. A successful industrial policy needs a far-sighted government.

Previous post:

Next post: